Spectrum WT v. Wendler

March 2023
West Texas A&M University (Public college or university)
Canyon, TX

Identity of Speakers

  • Spectrum WT

    West Texas A&M University's student-led LGBT+ organization

Additional Information

  • Incident Nature:
    Recognized student group event
  • Incident Political Orientation:
    Not Clear
  • Incident Responses:
    Title IX or other federal statute
  • Incident Status:
    In litigation Federal District Court
    In litigation Federal Court of Appeals
    In litigation U.S. Supreme Court
  • Did not involve Speech Codes


The U.S. Supreme Court on rejected an LGBT student group’s bid to compel West Texas A&M University to allow a charity drag show on campus while a lawsuit accusing the school of violating free speech rights for barring the event plays out.
The justices in an unsigned order denied a request by the LGBT student group, called Spectrum WT, to stop the school’s president, Walter Wendler, from prohibiting the show that he deemed misogynistic and disparaging of women. The student group has argued that the school violated the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment protections for freedom of speech.
Spectrum WT in March 2023 sued officials at the university, located in Canyon, Texas, after Wendler barred the drag show planned for that month. Drag shows typically feature men dressed as women. Wendler, in explaining his decision, said such performances “stereotype women in cartoon-like extremes for the amusement of others and discriminate against womanhood.”
The group later held the charity event off campus, but it continued to seek an injunction barring Wendler from prohibiting future events including a planned drag show on March 22. The group is represented by the non-profit free-speech advocacy group Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
FIRE senior attorney JT Morris expressed disappointment in the court’s ruling but vowed to continue to press Spectrum WT’s case in the lower courts.
“The show is not over,” Morris said.
Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who backed the university officials, praised the court’s decision to reject what he called the student group’s “extraordinary attempt to force the university to host this activity.”
“President Wendler’s efforts to uphold decency and protect women from hostile and degrading caricatures, and to protect children from exposure to obscene conduct, are completely defensible,” Paxton said.
Comparing drag shows to blackface performances, Wendler wrote “drag shows stereotype women in cartoon-like extremes for the amusement of others and discriminate against womanhood.”

“The WT community should live by the Golden Rule,” he added.  “As a Christian, I personally learned this in the book of Matthew. “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.” (Emphasis in original.)

Wendler admitted, however, his decision may not hold up in court. “I will not appear to condone the diminishment of any group … even when the law of the land appears to require it,” he wrote.

Spectrum WT’s lawsuit included an allegation that school officials violated First Amendment speech rights by discriminating against the group based on their viewpoint.
“The First Amendment protects expressive conduct, including performance theater (like drag shows), whether held in high regard by supporters or low esteem by detractors,” the lawsuit stated.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in an interim ruling in September 2023
denied the group’s request for a preliminary injunction, casting doubt on their First Amendment claims because “it is not clearly established that all drag shows are inherently expressive.”
The group appealed to the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which declined to fast-track the case, scheduling arguments for late April. Spectrum WT responded by asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the drag show ban while the case plays out.
The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
Some states including Texas have pursued Republican-backed measures targeting drag shows, drawing criticism from LGBT rights advocacy groups. A federal judge last September ruled that the Texas law limiting public drag performances was a First Amendment violation and forbid enforcement of it.