Identity of Speakers
-
University of Florida Board of Trustees
Faculty/Staff
OtherThe governing body responsible for overseeing the university’s policies, finances, and overall strategic direction
Resources
Additional Information
-
Incident Nature:
Other
-
Incident Political Orientation:
Not Clear -
Incident Responses:
University administration invoked formal speech code in response
University administration changed university policy as a consequence
State Campus Free Speech Act
-
Incident Status:
No litigation
- Did not involve Speech Codes
Summary
On December 5, 2025, the University of Florida Board of Trustees approved an institutional neutrality policy, stating that the university would remain neutral on political, social, and other issues not directly related to its educational or operational mission. The policy restricted university leaders from making statements on social issues using university resources, including emails, social media accounts, videos, and websites, unless the statement was issued by the president in consultation with the Board Chair. It clarified that personal opinions were allowed if they did not imply institutional endorsement and applied to actions taken in official capacities rather than private expression. Administrators described the policy as a way to preserve a campus environment conducive to free expression and prevent institutional advocacy from alienating students or faculty. The policy also outlined responsibilities for deans and department heads to monitor communications and ensure that university statements aligned with the neutrality guidelines, and it provided examples of communications that would be considered official versus personal.
Interim president Donald Landry sent a message to employees encouraging them to maintain institutional neutrality. He described the policy as a tool to ensure that leadership acted as scholars rather than advocates and to prevent the university from appearing to take sides on controversial social issues. Landry emphasized that the policy was intended to protect the university’s reputation and maintain trust among students, faculty, and the broader community, allowing academic discussions to continue without the university itself being perceived as endorsing particular viewpoints. He also noted that university events, public presentations, and official correspondence would need to be reviewed to ensure they did not inadvertently suggest institutional positions on contentious topics.
On December 9, 2025, the Faculty Senate discussed the policy during a meeting. Faculty members raised questions about the definitions of social issues and which positions qualified as leadership roles subject to the policy. Several senators expressed concern that the policy’s language was ambiguous and could create uncertainty about how it might affect classroom discussions or research on topics that intersected with contemporary social or political issues. Others highlighted the potential impact on departmental communications, guest speakers, and collaborative projects, and some faculty noted that they had limited opportunity to provide input before the policy’s adoption. Some senators suggested that additional guidance or training would be necessary to help faculty and staff understand the boundaries of the policy and avoid unintentional violations.
