Identity of Speakers
-
n/a
Student
Other
Resources
Additional Information
-
Incident Nature:
Other
-
Incident Political Orientation:
Not Clear -
Incident Responses:
State Campus Free Speech Act
Title IX or other federal statute
-
Incident Status:
No litigation
- Was Speech Code incident
Summary
On November 7, 2025, Cornell University and the Trump administration reached an agreement under which Cornell agreed to pay $60 million to the federal government as part of a settlement to restore more than $250 million in federal research funding that had been withheld earlier in the year amid civil rights compliance reviews. Cornell’s president said the deal would uphold academic freedom and institutional autonomy while resolving disputes over the interpretation of federal civil rights laws that the administration had cited in freezing funds and pursuing investigations into the university. Cornell agreed to pay $30 million to the U.S. government over three years and $30 million into research supporting U.S. farmers. The settlement also required Cornell to accept the administration’s interpretation of civil rights laws on matters including alleged antisemitism and other discrimination and to use certain Department of Justice guidance as a training resource for faculty and staff. The agreement ended ongoing civil rights investigations and restored all paused grants after months of funding disruption.
In the days after the announcement, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights released two Title VI investigation files related to alleged antisemitism at Cornell that became publicly accessible for the first time. These files detailed complaints filed in October 2023 and February 2024 alleging a toxic, antisemitic climate and other concerns about the university’s response to antisemitism complaints. The complaints included reports of professors making statements supporting Hamas, harassment and isolation of Jewish students, flyers promoting the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, and incidents such as vandalism of a student’s course roster. The investigations also examined whether the university’s grievance and reporting procedures adequately protected students from discrimination or retaliation. Following the settlement, those investigations were closed as part of the negotiated agreement, with federal officials agreeing Cornell would be treated like other universities for future grants and awards. University administrators emphasized that closing the investigations did not mean Cornell admitted wrongdoing under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
Several Cornell professors publicly weighed in on the settlement’s language and implications. Some faculty described aspects of the agreement critically, arguing that clauses linking funding restoration to Cornell’s payment and concession terms amounted to extortion dressed up in the language of contracts. Professors expressed concern that the legal framing of the settlement and the reliance on contractual consideration could set a troubling precedent for federal leverage over institutional policy. The settlement required Cornell to implement annual surveys of campus climate with a focus on the experiences of Jewish students, maintain records and data for federal review, provide training on civil rights compliance to faculty and staff, and adopt procedures to ensure timely reporting and investigation of complaints.
